Political Interventions in U.S. Human Embryo Research: An Ethical Assessment

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):220-228 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although the first human embryonic stem cells were produced in 1998, the direction of U.S. policy on stem cell research was set nearly 20 years earlier when the recommendations of a congressionally established Ethics Advisory Board were ignored by the Reagan administration. Thus began an unprecedented and unparalleled 30-year-long history of political intrusions in an area of scientific and biomedical research that has measurable impacts on the health of Americans. Driving these intrusions were religiously informed public policy positions that have usually escaped critical ethical analysis. Here I record my own encounters with this history of intrusions and the thinking behind them.My most abrupt encounter with the politics of stem cell research occurred on September 6, 2006, at a hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Related Agencies, chaired by Senator Arlen Specter. Just a week before, scientists at Advanced Cell Technology, a small Massachusetts biotech company, had published a paper in the journal Nature in which they described a method for extracting stem cells from early human embryos while leaving the embryos intact and viable. As head of ACT’s Ethics Advisory Board, I had supported this research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embryo Research: The Ethical Geography of the Debate.G. Khushf - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (5):495-519.
Embryo Research: The Challenge for Public Policy.P. A. King - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (5):441-455.
South Korea: Human Embryo Research.Young-Rhan Um - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (3):268-278.
Animal eggs for stem cell research: A path not worth taking. Fran - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):18 – 32.
The morality of embryo use.Louis M. Guenin - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The ethical use of paradoxical interventions in psychotherapy.D. M. Foreman - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):200-205.
Stem Cells, Nuclear Transfer and Respect for Embryos.Jens Clausen - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):48-59.
The Human Embryo Research Panel: Lessons for Public Ethics.Ronald M. Green - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (4):502.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
15 (#953,911)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy?William M. Sage - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
Introduction.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):175-190.
Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy?William M. Sage - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
Law, Science, and Innovation: Introduction to the Symposium.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):175-190.
Introduction.John A. Robertson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):175-190.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
"The Law of Peoples: With" The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,".John Rawls - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):396-396.
Critical Notices.John Rawls - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):241-246.

View all 6 references / Add more references