Institutional Policies for Responding to Allegations of Research Fraud

, , &
IRB: Ethics & Human Research 8 (4):1 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/3564176

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Policies for responding to allegations of fraud in research.Penelope J. Greene, Jane S. Durch, Wendy Horwitz & Valwyn S. Hooper - 1985 - Minerva 23 (2):203-215.
Accountability and responsibility in research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus & David E. Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct.Michael C. Loui - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):529-539.
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Responding to allegations of scientific misconduct: The procedure at the French national medical and health research institute.Jean-Philippe Breittmayer, Martine Bungener, Hugues De The, Evelyne Eschwege, Michel Fougereau, Gilles Guedj, Claude Kordon, Olivier Philippe, Maric-Catherine Postel-Vinay & Laurence Schaffar-Esterle - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):41-48.
Juggling through hoops: Implementing ethics policies in applied language studies. [REVIEW]Janna Fox, Natasha Artemeva, Richard Darville & Devon Woods - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):77-99.
Comparative fault and fraud.Andrew R. Klein - unknown
Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review.John E. Dahlberg & Nancy M. Davidian - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):713-735.
Individual and institutional conflict of interest: Policy review by research universities in the united states.Nils Hasselmo - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):421-427.
An introduction to research ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
I-ABM: combining institutional frameworks and agent-based modelling for the design of enforcement policies.Tina Balke, Marina De Vos & Julian Padget - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (4):371-398.
The medical research council’s approach to allegations of scientific misconduct.Imogen Evans - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):91-94.
Shareholder authorized inside trading: A legal and moral analysis. [REVIEW]Bill Shaw - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (12):913 - 928.
The ubiquity of greed: A contextual model for analysis of scienter.Patricia Sánchez Abril & Ann Morales Olazabal - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-07

Downloads
15 (#953,629)

6 months
4 (#799,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references