Fuzzy in 3–D: Two Contrasting Paradigms

Archives for the Philosophy and History of Soft Computing 2015 (2) (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ype-2 fuzzy sets and complex fuzzy sets are both three dimensional extensions of type-1 fuzzy sets. Complex fuzzy sets come in two forms, the standard form, postulated in 2002 by Ramot et al., and the 2011 innovation of pure complex fuzzy sets, proposed by Tamir et al.. In this paper we compare and contrast both forms of complex fuzzy set with type-2 fuzzy sets, as regards their rationales, applications, definitions, and structures. In addition, pure complex fuzzy sets are compared with type-2 fuzzy sets in relation to their inferencing operations. Complex fuzzy sets and type-2 fuzzy sets differ in their roles and applications; complex fuzzy sets are pertinent to inferencing where there is seasonality, and type-2 fuzzy sets are applicable to reasoning under uncertainty. Their definitions differ also, though there is equivalence between those of a pure complex fuzzy set and a type-2 fuzzy set. Structural similarity is evident between these three-dimensional sets. Complex fuzzy sets are represented by a 3–D line, and type-2 fuzzy sets by a 3–D surface, but a surface is simply a generalisation of a line. This similarity is particularly apparent between pure complex fuzzy sets and type-2 fuzzy sets, which are both mappings from the domain onto the unit square. However type-2 fuzzy sets were found not to be isomorphic to pure complex fuzzy sets. The mechanisms by which complex fuzzy sets model and quantify periodicity, and type-2 fuzzy sets model and quantify uncertainty are discussed. A type-2 fuzzy set can be represented as the union of its type-2 embedded set. An embedded type-2 fuzzy set is a type-2 fuzzy set in itself, whose geometrical representation is a 3-D line. Thus, geometrically an embedded type-2 fuzzy set can be seen as equivalent to a pure complex fuzzy set and therefore a type-2 fuzzy set can be represented as the union of a collection pure complex fuzzy sets, which in turn can be regarded as embedded complex fuzzy sets of a type-2 fuzzy set. This relationship is exploited to provide a complex definition of a type-2 fuzzy set.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Is Fuzzy Probability Theory?S. Gudder - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (10):1663-1678.
Fuzzy closure systems on L-ordered sets.Lankun Guo, Guo-Qiang Zhang & Qingguo Li - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (3):281-291.
A type of fuzzy ring.Hacı Aktaş & Naim Çağman - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (3-4):165-177.
A Composition of Fuzzy Sets.Vitaly I. Levin - 2015 - Studia Humana 4 (4):39-46.
Some guidelines for fuzzy sets application in legal reasoning.Jacky Legrand - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):235-257.
Fuzzy Galois connections on fuzzy posets.Wei Yao & Ling-Xia Lu - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (1):105-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-06

Downloads
4 (#1,627,077)

6 months
1 (#1,475,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fuzzy Sets.Lofti A. Zadeh - 1965 - Information and Control 8 (1):338--53.

Add more references