Can We Perceive the Past?

In Sara Aronowitz & Lynn Nadel (eds.), Space, Time, and Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A prominent view holds that perception and memory are distinguished at least partly by their temporal orientation: Perception functions to represent the present, while memory functions to represent the past. Call this view perceptual presentism. This chapter critically examines perceptual presentism in light of contemporary perception science. I adduce evidence for three forms of perceptual sensitivity to the past: (i) shaping perception by past stimulus exposure, (ii) recruitment of mnemonic representations in perceptual processing, and (iii) perceptual representation of present objects as possessing past properties. I argue that forms (i) and (ii) are consistent with perceptual presentism, while form (iii) poses a genuine threat to the view. While the empirical case for form (iii) remains inconclusive, I suggest that the most serious challenges to perceptual presentism derive from representations that integrate mnemonic and present-tensed elements in the performance of canonical perceptual functions, such as perceiving object continuity over time.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Re-membering.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:43-59.
Perceiving External Things and the Time‐Lag Argument.Sean Enda Power - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):94-117.
Perceptual Experience and the Capacity to Act.Susanna Schellenberg - 2010 - In N. Gangopadhay, M. Madary & F. Spicer (eds.), Perception, Action, and Consciousness. Oxford University Press. pp. 145.
The Nature of Perception.John Foster - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Preteriception: memory as past-perception.István Aranyosi - 2020 - Synthese 198 (11):10765-10792.
The veil of perception.G. A. J. Rogers - 1975 - Mind 84 (April):210-224.
On Whether we Can See Intentions.Shannon Spaulding - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (2):150-170.
Experiencing the Present.Uriah Kriegel - 2015 - Analysis 75 (3):407-413.
The Perception of Generals.Aaron Wilson - 2012 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (2):169-190.
Memory.[author unknown] - 2013 - In P. M. S. Hacker (ed.), The Intellectual Powers. Wiley. pp. 316-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-02

Downloads
410 (#47,883)

6 months
244 (#10,104)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

E. J. Green
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man.Thomas Reid - 1785 - University Park, Pa.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Derek R. Brookes & Knud Haakonssen.
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking.Ned Block - 2023 - New York, US: OUP Usa.
The skeptic and the dogmatist.James Pryor - 2000 - Noûs 34 (4):517–549.

View all 52 references / Add more references