Critical analysis of the philosophical conception of dao in Laozi's Daodejing and being in Heidegger's “Being and Time”

Abstract

That dao and being are correct as written about by Laozi and Heidegger respectively is exposed through eight focal points.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Much Adwu about Nothing: A Nonrealist Reading of Wang Bi’s Dao.Joseph Suk-Hwan Dowd - 2022 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 21 (2):183-195.
Heng and temporality of Dao: Laozi and Heidegger. [REVIEW]Qingjie Wang - 2001 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1 (1):55-71.
From Gift to Law: Thomas’s Natural Law and Laozi’s Heavenly Dao.Vincent Shen - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (3):251-270.
A Re-examination of the Paradox of the Dao.Sangmu Oh - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (4):483-501.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-28

Downloads
326 (#64,867)

6 months
99 (#49,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meontological Generativity: A Daoist Reading of the Thing.David Chai - 2014 - Philosophy East and West 64 (2):303-318.
Meontology in early xuanxue thought.David Chai - 2010 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (1):90-101.

Add more references