Saying "no" to compromise; "yes" to integration

Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1007-1013 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central fact underlying all relations is the question of power and how it can be used to get one's way. When power does not work, we move to compromise. This paper questions the validity of compromise as an effective means of settling differences. My standpoint is that compromise debases relationships, is wrong in principle and does not work in practice either. There is a better strategy: integration, when the contending parties find the wider solution that includes both their interests. Ethically right, integration also works better in practice, for it leads to longer-term, more productive and happier relations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#554,929)

6 months
2 (#1,206,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Creative Experience. By J. H. Tufts. [REVIEW]M. P. Follett - 1924 - International Journal of Ethics 35:189.

Add more references