Choosing priorities

Journal of Medical Ethics 5 (2):73-75 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dr Gray leaves us with a question at the conclusion of his article--how should we choose priorities? He says that the debate so far has been mainly on what we should choose, but perhaps we should consider how to choose even more. Under the various subheadings of Criteria, Principles and Persons Dr Gray sets out the pros and cons of the arguments in the priority debates and tries to offer some more specific guidelines to offset the criticism that the government's priority discussions have been too generalised. Yet this is a difficult task when everyone's priorities are so different

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
25 (#638,434)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Cost-benefit analysis and medical ethics.G. H. Mooney - 1980 - Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (4):177-179.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references