Adam Bede’s Dutch Realism and the Novelist’s Point of View

Philosophy and Literature 36 (2):404-423 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hegel was ambivalent about Dutch genre painting’s uncanny ability to find beauty in daily life. The philosopher regarded the Dutch painterly aesthetic as Romanticism avant la lettre, and classifies it as such in his Lectures on Aesthetics, under the section entitled “Die romantischen Künste [The Romantic arts].”1 Dutch art, in Hegel’s reading, is marred by many shortcomings. The most prominent among these are the “subjective stubbornness [subjective Beschlossenheit]” that prevents this art from attaining to the “free and ideal forms of expression” that marked the productions of Italian artists such as Raphael. In contradistinction to their Italian counterparts, Dutch artists in Hegel’s view are apt to.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
700 (#23,916)

6 months
221 (#11,869)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rebecca Ruth Gould
School of Oriental and African Studies

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy as a transitional genre.Richard Rorty - 2004 - In Richard J. Bernstein, Seyla Benhabib & Nancy Fraser (eds.), Pragmatism, Critique, Judgment: Essays for Richard J. Bernstein. MIT Press. pp. 3--28.

Add more references