A reinstatement, in response to Gillies, of Redhead's argument in support of induction

Philosophy of Science 54 (3):470-472 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/289395

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Evidential support, reliability, and Hume's problem of induction.Chris Tucker - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):503-519.
Truth and provability.John Lucas & Michael Redhead - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):331-2.
Truth and provability again.Jeffrey Ketland & Panu Raatikainen - manuscript
Truth and provability: A comment on Redhead.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):611-613.
On a recent objection to Popper and Miller's "disproof" of probabilistic induction.Colin Howson - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):675-680.
Behavioral Experiments for Assessing the Abstract Argumentation Semantics of Reinstatement.Iyad Rahwan, Mohammed I. Madakkatel, Jean-François Bonnefon, Ruqiyabi N. Awan & Sherief Abdallah - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (8):1483-1502.
Note on Induction.Ted Parent - 2013 - Think 12 (33):37-39.
Psychology, epistemology, and skepticism in Hume’s argument about induction.Louis E. Loeb - 2006 - Synthese 152 (3):321 - 338.
In defense of the Popper-Miller argument.Donald Gillies - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#703,773)

6 months
8 (#415,941)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support.Ellery Eells & Branden Fitelson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):129 - 142.
Bayes' theorem.James Joyce - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaconfirmation.Denis Zwirn & Herv� P. Zwirn - 1996 - Theory and Decision 41 (3):195-228.
Partly deductive support in the Popper-Miller argument.Burke Townsend - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):490-496.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

In defense of the Popper-Miller argument.Donald Gillies - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.
Corroboration, explanation, evolving probability, simplicity and a sharpened razor.I. J. Good - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):123-143.
On the impossibility of inductive probability.Michael Redhead - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (2):185-191.

Add more references