What engineers Donʼt learn and why they Don learn it: And how philosophy might be able to help

Abstract

This paper presented at WPE-2008 uses an industrial-based senior design as an opportunity to understand what what students don't learn in a fairly traditional cold war engineering curriculum. The paper identifies seven deficient skills: questioning, labeling, qualitative modeling, decomposing, visualizing/ideation, empirical testing, and communicating. The talk also identifies five reasons why engineers don't learn these things, and philosophy plays a prominent role in recifying the problem by aiding in providing conceptual clarity and offering alternative models of rigor.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Learning theory and epistemology.Kevin Kelly - 2004 - In Ilkka Niiniluoto, Matti Sintonen & Jan Wolenski (eds.), Handbook of Epistemology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. pp. 183--203.
Words, you, and me.Arthur B. Cody - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):277 – 293.
The importance of philosophy to engineering.Carl Mitcham - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):27-47.
Learning from questions on categorical foundations.Colin McLarty - 2005 - Philosophia Mathematica 13 (1):44-60.
Learning how to learn: A critique.Christopher Winch - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):649-665.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-24

Downloads
30 (#536,225)

6 months
3 (#984,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Goldberg
Westminster College, Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references