Ontology, epistemology, and private ostensive definition

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (1):137-147 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

People see five kinds of views in epistemology and ontology as hinging on there being words a person can learn only by private ostensive definitions, through direct acquaintance with his own sensations: skepticism about other minds, 2. skepticism about an external world, 3. foundationalism, 4. dualism, and 5. phenomenalism. People think Wittgenstein refuted these views by showing, they believe, no word is learnable only by private ostensive definition. I defend these five views from Wittgenstein’s attack.

Similar books and articles

Meaning and ostensive definition.C. H. Whiteley - 1956 - Mind 65 (July):332-335.
Wherefore the Failure of Private Ostension?George Wrisley - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):483 - 498.
A private language argument.Jack Temkin - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):109-121.
Wittgenstein on ostensive definition.P. M. S. Hacker - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):267 – 287.
Essays on Wittgenstein.Elmer Daniel Klemke - 1971 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.
Ostensive terms and materialism.Mark T. Thornton - 1972 - The Monist 56 (April):193-214.
On ostensive definitions.Janina Kotarbinska - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (1):1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
930 (#14,978)

6 months
167 (#18,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Irwin Goldstein
Davidson College

Citations of this work

Beliefs-in-a-Vat.Genia Schönbaumsfeld - 2017 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 117 (2):141-161.
Unnatural epistemology.John D. Greenwood - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (2):132-149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references