A Preface Paradox for Intention

Philosophers' Imprint 16 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that there is a preface paradox for intention. The preface paradox for intention shows that intentions do not obey an agglomeration norm, requiring one to intend conjunctions of whatever else one intends. But what norms do intentions obey? I will argue that intentions come in degrees. These partial intentions are governed by the norms of the probability calculus. First, I will give a dispositional theory of partial intention, on which degrees of intention are the degrees to which one possesses the dispositions characteristic of full intention. I will use this dispositional theory to defend probabilism about intention. Next, I will offer a more general argument for probabilism about intention. To do so, I will generalize recent decision theoretic arguments for probabilism from the case of belief to the case of intention.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Calendar Paradox.Sam Shpall - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (3):801-825.
War and intention.Darrell Cole - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):174-191.
Collective and joint intention.Raimo Tuomela - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (2):39-69.
Are intentions self-referential?Alfred R. Mele - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 52 (3):309-329.
On the principle of intention agglomeration.Jing Zhu - 2010 - Synthese 175 (1):89 - 99.
We-intentions revisited.Raimo Tuomela - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (3):327 - 369.
On a problem for contractarianism.Joe Mintoff - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):98 – 116.
Is an agreement an exchange of intentions?Joe Mintoff - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):44–67.
What are intentions?Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard - 2010 - In L. Nadel & W. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--84.
Conditional Intentions.Luca Ferrero - 2009 - Noûs 43 (4):700 - 741.
What I Will Do and What I Intend To Do.Richard K. Scheer - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (278):531-539.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-03

Downloads
117 (#153,591)

6 months
12 (#218,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Goldstein
University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

Structural Rationality and the Property of Coherence.Marc-Kevin Daoust - 2023 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (1):170-194.
A Question-Sensitive Theory of Intention.Bob Beddor & Simon Goldstein - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2):346-378.
Coherence as Joint Satisfiability.Samuel Fullhart & Camilo Martinez - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Intention.Kieran Setiya - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Does Chance Undermine Would?Alexander W. Kocurek - 2022 - Mind 131 (523):747-785.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references