Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled

Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):163-171 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two versions of the argument that prenatal diagnosis discriminates against the disabled are distinguished and analysed. Both are shown to be inadequate, but some valid concerns about the social effects of prenatal diagnosis are highlighted

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Genetic counseling and termination of pregnancy in hungary.Zoltan Papp - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):323-333.
A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Prenatal diagnosis: whose right?D. Heyd - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (5):292-297.
Prenatal Diagnosis: Confronting the Ethical Issues.Virginia N. Bolton - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):218-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
49 (#332,934)

6 months
3 (#1,042,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity.Evie Kendal - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (2):185-194.
In defense of selection for nondisease genes.Julian Savulescu - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):16 – 19.
Frykten for et samfunn uten Downs syndrom.Berge Solberg - 2008 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):33-52.
Etiske utfordringer med non-invasive prenatale tester.Bjørn Hofmann - 2014 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):67-87.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations