Authorship hypotheses and reliability of informants

Studia Logica 12 (1):171 - 194 (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf02126834

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The likelihood principle and the reliability of experiments.Andrew Backe - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):361.
Responsible Authorship: Why Researchers Must Forgo Honorary Authorship.Barton Moffatt - 2011 - Accountability in Research 18 (2):76-90.
Reliability as a virtue.Robert Audi - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):43 - 54.
Tracking track records, I.Peter Lipton - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):179–205.
On Hetherington's solution of the Goodman paradox.Nathan Stemmer - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (4):617-623.
Authorship Revisited: Conceptions of Authorship Around 1900 and 2000.G. J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.) - 2010 - Peeters.
Reliability connections between conceivability and inconceivability.Peter Murphy - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (2):195-205.
Reliability of information on the internet: Some distinctions.Anton Vedder & Robert Wachbroit - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):211-215.
Reliability of informants.Jerzy Giedymin - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (52):287-302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#488,557)

6 months
1 (#1,478,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references