Abstract

This text is the integrated vision of a man who has read widely and who does not hesitate to affirm truths from a variety of philosophical traditions whose presuppositions are not ontologically compatible. And this is precisely Putnam’s point: ontology has artificially divided thinkers into different schools. The division of contemporary philosophy into separate fields, he says, conceals the fact that arguments in one area are often just as valid in another. He notes that some thinkers who reject realism in ethics do not realize that by the same reasoning they must also reject realism in mathematics. Ethics Without Ontology is Putnam’s attempt to show an interrelatedness that has been hidden by inadequate understandings of objectivity and objects. He does not attempt to resolve the ontological differences. Rather, he takes them to be man-made.