The Rule of Unity and Causal Order From Both Ibn Sina's and Mohaghigh Tusi's View

Avicennian Philosophy Journal 13 (41):5-26 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Acceptance the philosophical rule of unity and belief in a unitary ground for all multiple creatures leads philosophers to the problem of the nature of emanation of multiplicity form God who is one from all respects. Peripatetic philosophers like Ibn Sina in response to this problem have proposed a well-known theory about the order of universe. In contrast, Muslim theologians with religious motives have opposed both this rule and philosophical views about the order of existence. Khajeh Nasir al-Din Tusi in his works by establishing the rule of one and in response to the criticism of opponents supports the theories of philosophers like Ibn Sina. However, in some of his works, Mohaghigh Tusi offers his own utterance. He believes that from the one, for the reason that it is one, emanates nothing except one, but emanation of multiple beings from a single ground with different aspects is possible. In his works, Mohaghigh Tusi carefully formulates the causal orders of creatures. In the first order a being emanates from the Most High and in the second order there are two beings which one of them has emanated from the first ground. In the following orders in addition to creatures which themselves have emanated from the Most High, become the source of different things, also special creatures emanate from the ground of the Most High.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Definition of Conversion from Ibn Sina's Point of View.Saeed Anvari & Rooh Allah Alami - 2008 - Avicennian Philosophy Journal 12 (40):102-124.
A Critique Of The Principle Of The One.Ali Riahi & Khadijah Moqaddam - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 57.
Carroll’s Paradox from the viewpoints of Wittgenstein, Ibn Sīnā, and Tūsī.Mahdi Azimi - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 18 (70):173-194.
Ibn-Sina's Innovations Concerning the Theory of Emanation.S. Jomee - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 25.
Ecthesis: An Account and Evaluation.Mehdi Azimi - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 9 (36):103-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references