Propositions and rigidity in layered drt

Abstract

• names and indexicals are directly referential/rigid designators • wide-scope behavior w.r.t. operators • not synonymous with the description giving their ‘descriptive meaning’, as shown by Kripke-Kaplan examples (1) and (2).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Rigidity and De Jure Rigidity.Mark Textor - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):45-59.
Are proper names rigid designators?Pierre Baumann - 2010 - Axiomathes 20 (2-3):333-346.
Rigidity, natural kind terms and metasemantics.Corine Besson - 2010 - In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge. pp. 25--44.
Denial and correction in Layered DRT.Emar Maier & Rob van der Sandt - 2003 - In Emar Maier & Rob van der Sandt (eds.), Proceedings of Diabruck'03. pp. 1-10.
Puzzles about descriptive names.Edward Kanterian - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (4):409-428.
Proper names and indexicals trigger rigid presuppositions.Emar Maier - 2009 - Journal of Semantics 26 (3):253-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-09

Downloads
25 (#633,432)

6 months
2 (#1,198,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references