Simulation theory on conceptual grounds

ProtoSociology 20:261-284 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I will present a conceptual argument for a simulationist answer to (2). Given that our conception of mental states is employed in attributing mental states to others, a simulationist answer to (2) supports a simulationist answer to (1). I will not address question (3). Answers to (1) and (2) do not yield an answer to (3), since (1) and (2) concern only our actual practices and concepts. For instance, an error theory about (1) and (2) would say that our practices and concepts manifest a mistaken view about the real nature of the mental. Finally, I will not address question (2a), which is an empirical question and so is not immediately relevant to the conceptual argument that is of concern here

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bringing Birth back down to Earth.Adam Lerner - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Simulation, Theory and Collapse.Bill Wringe - 2009 - Erkenntnis 71 (2):223-232.
Simulation, co-cognition, and the attribution of emotional states.Bill Wringe - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):353-374.
Mental Explicitness.Pierre Steiner - 2006 - Abstracta 3 (1):2-22.
Skeptic-cum-Augur.Brian Ribeiro - 2023 - Ancient Philosophy 43 (2):503-515.
The mentalizing folk.Alvin I. Goldman - 2002 - ProtoSociology 16:7-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#761,575)

6 months
5 (#711,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brie Gertler
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references