Similarity and the development of rules

&
Cognition 65 (2-3):263-297 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00002-x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Opposites detract: Why rules and similarity should not be viewed as opposite ends of a continuum.Gary Marcus - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):28-29.
Preferring rules to similarity: Coherence, goals, and commitment.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):37-49.
The rules versus similarity distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Digging beneath rules and similarity.Arthur B. Markman, Sergey Blok, Kyungil Kim, Levi Larkey, Lisa R. Narvaez, C. Hunt Stilwell & Eric Taylor - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):29-30.
In search of radical similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
Instantiated rules and abstract analogy: Not a continuum of similarity.Lee R. Brooks & Samuel D. Hannah - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):17-17.
Rules, similarity, and threshold logic.Włodzisław Duch - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):23-23.
“Commitment” distinguishes between rules and similarity: A developmental perspective.Gil Diesendruck - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):21-22.
Similarity and Rules United: Similarity‐ and Rule‐Based Processing in a Single Neural Network.Tom Verguts & Wim Fias - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (2):243-259.
Rules and similarity – a false dichotomy.James A. Hampton - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):26-26.
Processing is shaped by multiple tasks: There is more to rules and similarity than rules-to-similarity.Gary Lupyan & Gautam Vallabha - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):28-28.
Rules and similarity processes in artificial grammar and natural second language learning: What is the “default”?Peter Robinson - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):32-33.
Rules work on one representation; similarity compares two representations.Todd M. Bailey - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):16-16.
Integration of “rules” and “similarity” in a framework of information compression by multiple alignment, unification, and search.J. Gerard Wolff - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):36-37.
Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy.Dedre Gentner & Cecile Toupin - 1986 - Cognitive Science 10 (3):277-300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
74 (#227,807)

6 months
13 (#218,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

José Medina
Vanderbilt University

Citations of this work

Précis of the origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):113-124.
The role of moral commitments in moral judgment.Tania Lombrozo - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (2):273-286.

View all 55 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.

View all 46 references / Add more references