Apocalyptic thinking versus nonviolent action

Abstract

Throughout the Cold War, we heard public cries that nuclear war would destroy us. Many citizens rejected the governmentally crafted myth of protection. They did not believe in the 1960s that a fallout shelter boom or in the 1980s that a star wars boom would protect them from the big boom. Instead, they thought the Big Boom would bring on global doom. Currently, we are hearing our initial post-Cold War version of the myth of protection. This time the star wars fallacy is being repackaged as a missile defense system. Then, following the events of 11 September 2001, a further shift occurred. Now, we hear that the Office of Homeland Security will protect us from terrorists and from weapons of mass destruction, whether nuclear, chemical, or biological.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#272,384)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Gay
University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references