Abstract

This dissertation examines the relationship between Aristotelian virtue-based character and the decision-making process. Previous research has proposed and some have tested ethical decision-making models, however these models have all examined the outcome decision. This study examines the process of how a decision maker comes to a decision and the role that personal character plays in that process. ;The study takes two steps in this initial attempt to define and measure personal character. First, Aristotelian virtue-based character is defined and three facets of character are identified. The three facets are self-transcendent values, moral approbation and emotional intelligence. Second, these three facets are examined, independently and collectively, in relation to the decision maker's consideration of the needs of others and his or her willingness to delay gratification when making decisions. ;The results of this study indicate that character is not unidimensional but a multifaceted integration of self-transcendent values, moral approbation and emotional intelligence. This result indicates that it is the decision maker who possesses high levels of all three elements who is most willing to consider the needs of others along with his or her own needs and who is willing to delay their personal gratification in order to produce a better outcome for all. ;In conclusion, implications for practice are suggested for both the individual and the organization. This information can be used to create personal development programs or organizational programs for the selection and development of employees who can make decisions in accord with the desires of the organization. Finally, the study concludes with future directions of this research that include a closer examination of the affects of culture and other environmental elements on this relationship