Review of: "Further Chaos and Dysfunction in the Brickyard and the Systems That Support It"

Qeios (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Review of: "Further Chaos and Dysfunction in the Brickyard and the Systems That Support It"

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Using a dialectical scientific brief in peer review.Arthur Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.
Some Opinions on the Review Process of Research Papers Destined for Publication.Ehsan Roohi & Omid Mahian - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):809-812.
A Code of Conduct for Peer Reviewers and Editors.Steven James Bartlett - 2019 - Willamette University Faculty Research Website.
Advances in peer review research: an introduction.Arthur E. Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.
Kuhn, Thomas S.James A. Marcum - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Alternatives to review by peers: A contribution to the theory of scientific choice. [REVIEW]Rustum Roy - 1984 - Minerva 22 (3-4):316-328.
The limitations to our understanding of peer review. [REVIEW]Tony Ross-Hellauer & Jonathan P. Tennant - 2020 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 5 (1).
Using a dialectical scientific brief in peer review.Arthur Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.
Using a dialectical scientific brief in Peer review.Arthur Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.
Peering, viewing and reviewing: What makes a Peer review good. Mohini & Sakir Ahmed - 2022 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 3 (2):119-124.
A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.Mehdi Dadkhah, Mohsen Kahani & Glenn Borchardt - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1603-1610.
A new forum for research on research integrity and peer review.Elizabeth Wager, Iveta Simera, Maria K. Kowalczuk & Stephanie L. Harriman - 2016 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1).
Tug of Love (Review of Kuhn versus Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science). [REVIEW]Ray Scott Percival - 2003 - New Scientist (2411).
Peer review and the pillar of salt: a case study.James Lawrence Powell - 2023 - Research Ethics 19 (1):78-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-03

Downloads
124 (#148,422)

6 months
56 (#84,983)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references