Win win's struggles with the institutional transfer of the Emily's list model to japan: The role of accountability and policy

Japanese Journal of Political Science 12 (1):75-94 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article addresses the complexities of institutional transfer by exploring the case of EMILY's List and WIN WIN, two women's organizations in the US and Japan respectively that seek to increase the number of women in office by providing funds early in candidatescultures of giving’ exist, they do not necessarily preclude the success of an EMILY's List-type organization in Japan. Instead, WIN WIN made significant strategic organizational decisions that have impeded its ability to have a significant impact on female candidacy at the national level. Specifically, WIN WIN's lack of accountability to its members combined with its broader commitment to gender consciousness have limited its success

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paired-associate transfer following early stages of list I learning.Richard M. Schulman - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):589.
Role of prior-list organization in a free recall transfer task.Peter A. Ornstein - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):32.
"Fate" of first-list associations in transfer theory.Jean M. Barnes & Benton J. Underwood - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (2):97.
Shifting Domestic and International Perceptions of Japan's Economy.Asahi Noguchi - 2012 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 13 (2):255-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
45 (#356,173)

6 months
12 (#223,131)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references