Tense Logic and the Master Argument

History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 2 (1):203-224 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We may distinguish between two ways of understanding tense-logical formulae, depending on whether we construe tense operators as operators on sentences or on predicates. Bearing this distinction in mind helps us formalise the premisses of Diodorus Cronus' Master Argument correctly, and give a formal reconstruction of the Argument itself

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘Now’ and ‘Then’ in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229-247.
Modal logic, truth, and the master modality.Torben Braüner - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):359-386.
The master argument and branching time.Lars Gundersen - 1997 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 5:49-60.
Predicate Metric Tense Logic for 'Now' and 'Then'.M. J. Cresswell - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):1-24.
Tense Logic Without Tense Operators.Frank Wolter - 1996 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 42 (1):145-171.
A note on the interpolation property in tense logic.Frank Wolter - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (5):545-551.
Worlds and Times.Ulrich Meyer - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):25--37.
Logic: The Megarics.Susanne Bobzien - 1999 - In Keimpe Algra & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
12 (#1,090,149)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Gaskin
University of Liverpool

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references