Helping Others to Understand: A Normative Account of the Speech Act of Explanation

Topoi 42 (2):385-396 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper offers a normative account of the speech act of explanation with understanding as its norm. The previous accounts of the speech act of explanation rely on the factive notion of understanding and maintain that proper explanations require knowledge. I argue, however, that such accounts are too demanding and do not reflect the everyday practice of explanation and the attribution of understanding. Instead, I argue that the non-factive, objectual attitude of understanding is sufficient for a proper explanation. On the normative level, explanations are governed by an audience-centred norm, i.e., they are sensitive to the epistemic position of the audience. According to the proposed account, an explanation is a communicative act in which one puts the audience in a position to understand the explained phenomenon. This proposal fits into the recent wave of applications of the normative account and makes space for the pluralism of illocutionary acts.

Similar books and articles

Socially constructed technology.David J. Stump - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):217 – 224.
Reasons why in normative explanation.Pekka Väyrynen - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (6):607-623.
On the Logic of Intentional Help.Roderick M. Chisholm & Dean W. Zimmerman - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):402-404.
Teaching Philosophy as a Tool for Helping Children Understand Problems Properly.Young-Sam Chun - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 27:23-28.
How Inclusive Is European Philosophy of Science?Hans Radder - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):149-165.
Who Do We Think We Are?Andrea Westlund - 2019 - Philosophy and Literature 43 (1):173-191.
If You're Quasi-Explaining, You're Quasi-Losing.Derek Baker - 2021 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 16. Oxford University Press.
The Metaphorical Conception of Scientific Explanation: Rereading Mary Hesse.Maria Rentetzi - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):377-391.
The metaphorical conception of scientific explanation: Rereading Mary Hesse. [REVIEW]Maria Rentetzi - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):377 - 391.
Normative Judgment and Technoscience.Evan Selinger - 2008 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12 (2):120-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
300 (#66,832)

6 months
139 (#26,084)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Grzegorz Gaszczyk
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and Lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):353-356.
Speech Acts.J. Searle - 1969 - Foundations of Language 11 (3):433-446.
The nature of explanation.Peter Achinstein - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
No understanding without explanation.Michael Strevens - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):510-515.

View all 71 references / Add more references