Bell's theorem and Bayes' theorem

Foundations of Physics 20 (12):1475-1512 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bell's theorem is expounded as an analysis in Bayesian probabilistic inference. Assume that the result of a spin measurement on a spin-1/2 particle is governed by a variable internal to the particle (local, “hidden”), and examine pairs of particles having zero combined angular momentum so that their internal variables are correlated: knowing something about the internal variable of one tells us something about that of the other. By measuring the spin of one particle, we infer something about its internal variable; through the correlation, about the internal variable of the second particle, which may be arbitrarily distant and is by hypothesis unchanged by this measurement (locality); and make (probabilistic) prediction of spin observations on the second particle. Each link in this chain has a counterpart in the Bayesian analysis of the situation. Irrespective of the details of the internal variable description, such prediction is violated by measurements on many particle pairs, so that locality—effectively the only physics invoked—fails. The time ordering of the two measurements is not Lorentz-invariant, implying acausality. Quantum mechanics is irrelevant to this reasoning, although its correct predictions of the statistics of the results imply it has a nonlocal—acausal interpretation; one such, the “transactional” interpretation, is presented to demonstrable advantage, and some misconceptions about quantum theory are pursued. The “unobservability” loophole in photonic Bell experiments is proven to be closed. It is shown that this mechanism cannot be used for signalling; signalling would become possible only if the hidden variables, which we insist must underlie the statistical character of the observations (the alternative is to give up), are uncovered in deviations from quantum predictions. Their reticence is understood as a consequence of their nonlocality: it is not easy to isolate and measure something nonlocal. Once the hidden variables are found, all the problems of quantum field theory and of quantum gravity might melt away

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bell's theorem, inference, and quantum transactions.A. J. M. Garrett - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (4):381-402.
Towards a Local Hidden Variable Theory.Peter J. Lewis - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (10):1461-1469.
Nonlocality Without Nonlocality.Steven Weinstein - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (8):921-936.
Locality and Bell's Theorem.W. De Baere, A. Mann & M. Revzen - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (1):67-77.
Hidden variables and locality.Jeffrey Bub - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (5):511-525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
107 (#166,876)

6 months
13 (#215,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Garrett
Boston University

References found in this work

On the impossible pilot wave.J. S. Bell - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (10):989-999.
The zitterbewegung interpretation of quantum mechanics.David Hestenes - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (10):1213-1232.
Quantum mechanics from self-interaction.David Hestenes - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (1):63-87.
Bell's theorem, inference, and quantum transactions.A. J. M. Garrett - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (4):381-402.

View all 7 references / Add more references