The Basic Fault in the Philosophy of Science

Abstract

The basic fault in the philosophy of science is simple enough to put in words and now it is time to do that. This basic fault puts the food on the table for philosophers and scientists, so it is hard to actually get the word out. That is not my problem, though. The basic fault is that we still assume that there is some kind of stuff that ‘everything’ consists of. My aim is to show how we can make it right.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Grices Doppelfehler.Georg Meggle & Maria Ulkan - 1992 - ProtoSociology 2:16-23.
The role of basic science in evidence-based medicine.Adam La Caze - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):81-98.
The fault is of the sufferer.A. M. Patel - 2014 - Gujarat, India: Dada Bhagwan Aradhana Trust. Edited by Niruben Amin.
Rebooting Science 1.0.Johan Gamper - 2021 - Stockholm, Sweden: BoD - Books on Demand.
Is God Hidden, Or Does God Simply Not Exist?Ian M. Church - 2017 - In Mark Harris & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Religion for Everyone. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 62-70.
Men and Women Behaving Badly: Is Fault Dead in English Family Law?Andrew Bainham - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (2):219-238.
Luck-Egalitarianism: Faults and Collective Choice.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2011 - Economics and Philosophy 27 (2):151-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-27

Downloads
111 (#160,607)

6 months
111 (#38,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johan Gamper
Subrosa KB

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On a Loophole in Causal Closure.Johan Gamper - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (2):631-636.

Add more references