Comments on "A power comparison of the F and L tests: I."

Psychological Review 73 (4):372-375 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0023428

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A comparison of the power of the U and t tests.C. Allan Boneau - 1962 - Psychological Review 69 (3):246-256.
The ethics of two- and one-sided hypothesis tests for clinical trials.A. Owen - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (2):100-102.
The factors of speed and power in tests of intelligence.F. S. Freeman - 1931 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 14 (1):83.
APower Comparison of the F and L Tests--I.Frederick J. Boersma, James J. DeJonge & Walter R. Stellwagen - 1964 - Psychological Review 71 (6):505-513.
Novel evidence and severe tests.Deborah G. Mayo - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):523-552.
A game-theoretic comparison of the utilitarian and maximin rules of social choice.Paul Weirich - 1988 - Erkenntnis 28 (1):117 - 133.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
Reply to Hawthorne.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2).
Metaphilosophical Criteria for Worldview Comparison.Clément Vidal - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (3):306-347.
Comments on Clark Glymour's explanations, tests, unity and necessity.Wesley C. Salmon - 1980 - Noûs 14 (1):51-52.
Tests in Print II. An Index to Tests, Test Reviews, and the Literature on Specific Tests.Oscar K. Buros - 1976 - British Journal of Educational Studies 24 (1):99-100.
mith on a Comparison of some Mental and Physical Tests. [REVIEW]Edward L. Thorndike - 1905 - Journal of Philosophy 2 (7):193.
Power, Discourse, and Subject. The Case of Laclau and Foucault.Lotar Rasiński - 2011 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):117-136.
Additional comments on the a parameter of Horvath's model for free association tests.E. C. Dalrymple-Alford - 1973 - Psychological Review 80 (1):93-94.
Tests for intrinsicness tested.Kelvin J. McQueen & René van Woudenberg - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (11):2935-2950.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
12 (#1,092,565)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references