From the specious to the suspicious present: The jack Horner phenomenology of William James

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 11 (3):163-189 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

William James on time perception.Gerald E. Myers - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (September):353-360.
How long is now? Phenomenology and the specious present.Susan Pockett - 2003 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (1):55-68.
William James and phenomenology.James M. Edie - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (3):481-526.
Phenomenology.Govinda Chandra Dev & Saiyed Abdul Hai (eds.) - 1969 - [Dacca,: Pakistan Philosophical Congress].
Are transcendental arguments distinctive?Jack K. Horner - 1977 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):317-326.
William James.Max Carl Otto (ed.) - 1942 - Madison,: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#370,312)

6 months
4 (#792,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references