Written for the Moment

Journal of Information Ethics 21 (1):21-26 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that the disclosure, dissemination, sale, and publication of texts—such as text messages, e-mails, and letters—addressed to anyone other than the public at large are gravely and profoundly immoral. The argument has two strands, the first based on a conception of privacy largely due to Steven Davis (2009), and the second based on the concept of authorial autonomy and its reverse, authorial dilution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-05

Downloads
59 (#273,284)

6 months
12 (#218,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Is there a right to privacy?Steven Davis - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475.
Misplacing privacy.Mark Alfino - 2001 - Journal of Information Ethics 10 (2):5-8.

Add more references