Taking a strong interactional stance

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e29 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We outline two points of criticism. Firstly, we argue that robots do constitute a separate category of beings in people's minds rather than being mere depictions of non-robotic characters. Secondly, we find that (semi-)automatic processes underpinning communicative interaction play a greater role in shaping robot-directed speech than Clark and Fischer's theory of social robots as depictions indicate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The use of interactional metadiscourse in job postings.Xiaoli Fu - 2012 - Discourse Studies 14 (4):399-417.
Egocentrism, allocentrism, and Asperger syndrome.Uta Frith & Frederique de Vignemont - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (4):719-738.
Taking the Historian’s Stance in a Natural Science.Zsuzsa Káldy - 2021 - In Judit Gervain, Gergely Csibra & Kristóf Kovács (eds.), A Life in Cognition: Studies in Cognitive Science in Honor of Csaba Pléh. Springer Verlag. pp. 195-207.
Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs.Greg Myers - 2010 - Critical Discourse Studies 7 (4):263-275.
Derived embodiment and imaginative capacities in interactional expertise.Theresa Schilhab - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):309-325.
Theorizing Fairtrade From a Justice-Related Standpoint.Valentin Beck - 2010 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 3:1-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-07

Downloads
9 (#1,273,635)

6 months
3 (#1,029,281)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations