Simultaneous segmentation and generalisation of non-adjacent dependencies from continuous speech

&
Cognition 147 (C):70-74 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.010

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

All Together Now: Concurrent Learning of Multiple Structures in an Artificial Language.Alexa R. Romberg & Jenny R. Saffran - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (7):1290-1320.
Implicit Acquisition of Grammars With Crossed and Nested Non-Adjacent Dependencies: Investigating the Push-Down Stack Model.Julia Uddén, Martin Ingvar, Peter Hagoort & Karl M. Petersson - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (6):1078-1101.
Automatic phonetic segmentation of Hindi speech using hidden Markov model.Archana Balyan, S. S. Agrawal & Amita Dev - 2012 - AI and Society 27 (4):543-549.
Bootstrapping the lexicon: a computational model of infant speech segmentation.Eleanor Olds Batchelder - 2002 - Cognition 83 (2):167-206.
Speech evolved from vocalization, not mastication.Uwe Jürgens - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):519-520.
A computational model of word segmentation from continuous speech using transitional probabilities of atomic acoustic events.Okko Räsänen - 2011 - Cognition 120 (2):149-176.
The impact of adjacent-dependencies and staged-input on the learnability of center-embedded hierarchical structures.Jun Lai & Fenna H. Poletiek - 2011 - Cognition 118 (2):265-273.
Lexical and Sublexical Units in Speech Perception.Ibrahima Giroux & Arnaud Rey - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (2):260-272.
Visual signal detection as a function of sequential variability of simultaneous speech.John S. Antrobus & Jerome L. Singer - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (6):603.
The Effect of Sonority on Word Segmentation: Evidence for the Use of a Phonological Universal.Marc Ettlinger, Amy S. Finn & Carla L. Hudson Kam - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (4):655-673.
How Many Mechanisms Are Needed to Analyze Speech? A Connectionist Simulation of Structural Rule Learning in Artificial Language Acquisition.Aarre Laakso & Paco Calvo - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (7):1243-1281.
When 'more'in statistical learning means 'less' in language: individual differences in predictive processing of adjacent dependencies.Jennifer B. Misyak & Morten H. Christiansen - 2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 2686--2691.
Macrophonic speech.E. W. Scripture - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (6):784.
Transitional probability is not a general mechanism for the segmentation of speech.T. G. Bever, J. R. Lackner & W. Stolz - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):387.
Parity still isn't a generalisation problem.R. I. Damper - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):307-308.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-02

Downloads
20 (#764,377)

6 months
5 (#628,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Syntactic Structures.J. F. Staal - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (2):245-251.
Language as shaped by the brain.Morten H. Christiansen & Nick Chater - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):489-509.

View all 19 references / Add more references