Dialectical Obligations of Serial Arguers

Abstract

I examine the concept of the relationship negotiation dialogue in the context of serial arguing. Between argument episodes, marital partners experiencing difficulty may think about entering counseling, or terminating their relationship. Removed from the dialogical context, such judgments involve the notions of argument as inquiry and argument0. I explore the dialectical obligations of a person who decides to end his relationship.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Wigmore's Chart Method.Jean Goodwin & Alec Fisher - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (3).
Continuity between serial memory and serial learning.Addison E. Woodward - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (1):90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
7 (#1,391,414)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic.Michael A. Gilbert - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (3):245-264.
A Third Perspective on Argument.Dale Hample - 1985 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 18 (1):1 - 22.

Add more references