A reply to mr. Mattick's article on marxism and the new physics

Philosophy of Science 31 (3):289-293 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It will be recalled that Mr. Mattick stated that Marxism does not derive its social theory from physical theory, and that any attempt to do so is an aberration from marxism. It is maintained that Marx is not a determinist or indeterminist in the ususal sense of these terms. Furthermore, it was argued that ideologies are no longer decisive weapons and that Marxists put little trust in the dialectical course of history.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marxism and Physics: A New Look.Hyman Frankel - 1991 - Science and Society 55 (3):336 - 347.
Marxism and philosophy.Karl Korsch - 1970 - New York,: M[onthly] R[eview Press.
Scientific socialism and democracy: A response to Femia.John O'Neill - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):345-353.
Marxism and the new physics.Paul Mattick - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (4):350-364.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#585,820)

6 months
8 (#411,621)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references