Animals and Friendship: A Reply to Rowlands

Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (2):187-189 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can humans be friends with animals? If so, what would the moral implications of such friendship be? In a previous issue of this journal, we argued that humans can indeed be friends with animals and that such friendships are morally valuable. The present article is a comment on Mark Rowlands’s reply to our original article. We argue that our original argument is not undermined by Rowlands’s attack.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.
Why virtual friendship is no genuine friendship.Barbro Fröding & Martin Peterson - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (3):201-207.
Responding to animals.Mark Rowlands - 2010 - Common Knowledge 16 (2):351-360.
The Mental Life of Some Animals.Mark Rowlands - 1994 - Between the Species 10 (3):4.
Friendship With God?Wanda Cizewski - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):369-381.
Animals and Moral Motivation: A Response to Clement.Mark Rowlands - 2013 - Journal of Animal Ethics 3 (1):15-24.
Can Animals Be Moral?Mark Rowlands - 2012 - New York, US: Oup Usa.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
30 (#535,608)

6 months
15 (#170,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Peterson
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

In praise of animals.Rhys Borchert & Aliya R. Dewey - 2023 - Biology and Philosophy 38 (4):1-26.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Animal Ethics Based on Friendship.Barbro Frööding & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (1):58-69.

Add more references