Letters: "Unduly Iterative Ethical Review?"

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):209-209 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:“Unduly Iterative Ethical Review?”Franklin G. MillerMadam:Renée C. Fox and Nicholas A. Christakis have written a provocative article, “Perish and Publish: Non-Heart-Beating Organ Donation and Unduly Iterative Ethical Review” (KIEJ, December 1995). The language of their argument and some of the implicit assumptions on which it rests deserve critical scrutiny. They describe the articles presenting and commenting on the University of Pittsburgh protocol as “disquieting” because the display “trial-and-error ethics.” To dismiss “trial-and-error ethics” implies that we antecedently possess all the moral knowledge we need to evaluate and regulate developments in medicine. Should we summarily reject experimentation in ethics, particularly with respect to complex issues involving scientific and technological changes? For if we need to reconsider and possibly revise what counts as moral knowledge, the proposing an experimental approach to the ethics of a novel practice, which is presented publicly and made open to revision, as in the Pittsburgh protocol, may be precisely the best way to proceed.Fox and Christakis resort to invidious insinuation in their criticism of ethicists who have written, and journals that have published, articles about non-heart-beating organ donation. Publication on this issue has given ethicists the opportunity of “adding numerous items to their vitae.” Their appraisal of the vitae-boosting behavior represents an interesting rhetorical specimen: “Although there is nothing inherently dishonorable about this it does create tension between two motives: conviction about the importance of perfecting ethical conduct, on the one hand, and the desire to advance one’s professional career, on the other” (p. 340). I am not sure what the authors mean by “perfecting ethical conduct.” Yet they suggest that a group of reputable scholars, who have taken diverse positions on the ethics of non-heart-beating organ donation, have come perilously close to venality.Finally, in order to avoid further legitimating what they consider to be an ethically objectionable practice, the authors advocate that journals exercise “restraint” in publishing articles about this topic. Perhaps in a future pronouncement they will enlighten us about how enforcing a publication policy that avoids the vice of “unduly iterative ethical review” might work without compromising freedom of discussion. Moral dogmatism and censorship have a long history of association.Franklin G. MillerCenter for Biomedical Ethics University of Virginia Charlottesville, VACopyright © 1996 The Johns Hopkins University Press...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unduly iterative ethical review?Franklin G. Miller - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):209-209.
The iterative conception of set.Thomas Forster - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):97-110.
Plural Quantification and the Iterative Concept of Set.Stephen Pollard - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:579-587.
Iterative set theory.M. D. Potter - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (171):178-193.
On the iterative explanation of the paradoxes.Christopher Menzel - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (1):37 - 61.
Letters. Johannes, John of John of Salisbury & Christopher Brooke - 1955 - New York,: T. Nelson. Edited by W. J. Millor, Harold Edgeworth Butler & Christopher Brooke.
Wide Sets, ZFCU, and the Iterative Conception.Christopher Menzel - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (2):57-83.
Logically possible machines.Eric Steinhart - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (2):259-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
13 (#1,062,726)

6 months
13 (#219,505)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Franklin Miller
Columbia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references