Case comment: Quantification of the ‘proof beyond reasonable doubt’ standard

Law, Probability and Risk 6:159-165 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argues for a minimal level of quantification for the "proof beyond reasonable doubt" standard of criminal law: if a jury asks "Is 60% enough?", the answer should be "No."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
75 (#221,804)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Treatise on Probability. [REVIEW]Harry T. Costello - 1923 - Journal of Philosophy 20 (11):301-306.
Guilt beyond reasonable doubt.Barbara Davidson & Robert Pargetter - 1987 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (2):182 – 187.

Add more references