James and Bradley on Immediate Experience

Bradley Studies 5 (2):126-138 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Immediate experience is not, currently, a fashionable topic in philosophy. Few, if any, contemporary philosophers offer commentaries on, or discussions of, immediate experience, especially the conception of it that was generally accepted in the early part of the twentieth century. Immediate experience has come to be identified with the immediately given and since ‘the given’ has been labelled a myth, immediate experience shares its fate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bradley's doctrine of experience.James Ward - 1925 - Mind 34 (133):13-38.
Philosophy after F.H. Bradley. [REVIEW]James Thomas - 1997 - Bradley Studies 3 (2):186-191.
Baking with Kant and Bradley.Jessica Leech & Emily Thomas - 2013 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 19 (1):75-94.
Hume on relations: Are they real?Yumiko Inukai - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):185-209.
Pure experience: The response to William James.Eugene Taylor & Robert H. Wozniak - 1996 - In E. I. Taylor & R. H. Wozniak (eds.), Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Bristol: Thoemmes Press. pp. 338-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
24 (#662,112)

6 months
3 (#984,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references