The Local Validity of Special Relativity, Part 1: Geometry

Philosophy of Physics 1 (1) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this two-part essay, we distinguish several senses in which general relativity has been regarded as “locally special relativistic.” Here, in Part 1, we focus on senses in which a relativistic spacetime has been said to be “locally (approximately) Minkowskian.” After critiquing several proposals in the literature, we present a result capturing a substantive sense in which every relativistic spacetime is locally approximately Minkowskian. We then show that Minkowski spacetime is not distinguished in this result: every relativistic spacetime is locally approximately every other spacetime in the same sense. In Part 2, we will consider “locally specially relativistic” matter theories.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Geometry and special relativity.Geoffrey Joseph - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (3):425-438.
Relativity and geometry.Roberto Torretti - 1983 - New York: Dover Publications.
Conventionalism and general relativity.I. W. Roxburgh & R. K. Tavakol - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (3-4):229-237.
Conservation, inertia, and spacetime geometry.James Owen Weatherall - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67:144-159.
On the role of special relativity in general relativity.Harvey R. Brown - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):67 – 81.
A Glimpse of Special Theory of Relativity.Arjun Dahal - 2017 - Journal of St. Xavier's Physics Council:5.
Time in Classical and Relativistic Physics.Gordon Belot - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Chichester, UK: Blackwell. pp. 185-200.
Two dogmas of dynamicism.James Owen Weatherall - 2020 - Synthese 199 (S2):253-275.
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Philosophical Model of Special Relativity.Alexander Klimets - 2012 - Quantum Magic 9 (3):3113-3123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-30

Downloads
9 (#1,246,467)

6 months
9 (#300,363)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Samuel C. Fletcher
University of Minnesota
James Weatherall
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

How to Teach General Relativity.Guy Hetzroni & James Read - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references