Professor Sokal's Bad Joke

Abstract

He had made it all up, he said, and gloated that his "prank" proved that sociologists and humanists who spoke of science as a "social construction" didn't know what they were talking about. Acknowledging the ethical issues raised by his deception, Professor Sokal declared it justified by the importance of the truths he was defending from postmodernist attack: "There is a world; its properties are not merely social constructions; facts and evidence do matter. What sane person would contend otherwise?".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
23 (#700,353)

6 months
1 (#1,507,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Vacuity of Postmodernist Methodology.Nicholas Shackel - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):295-320.
The Sokal Affair in Context.Stephen Hilgartner - 1997 - Science, Technology and Human Values 22 (4):506-522.
Studying the study of science scientifically.David L. Hull - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (3):209-231.
Splendours and miseries of the science wars.Nick Jardine & Marina Frasca-Spada - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (2):219-235.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references