Ordered preference differences without ordered preferences

Synthese 67 (2):361 - 368 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Axiomatizations of ordered preference differences typically assume that preferences are ordered. However, the mere assumption that preference differences can be ordered says nothing about whether preferences themselves are ordered. Utility representations for ordered differences without ordered preferences are investigated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#282,146)

6 months
5 (#646,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Basic Measurement Theory.Patrick Suppes & Joseph Zinnes - 1963 - In D. Luce & Robert Bush (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Volume I. John Wiley & Sons.. pp. 1-76.
Foundational aspects of theories of measurement.Dana Scott & Patrick Suppes - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (2):113-128.
Nontransitive measurable utility.Peter C. Fishburn - 1982 - Journal of Mathematical Psychology 26:31–67.
Elements of a theory of inexact measurement.Ernest W. Adams - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):205-228.

Add more references