Interpreting the "Variorum"

Critical Inquiry 2 (3):465-485 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The willows and the hazel copses greenShall now no more be seenFanning their joyous leaves to thy soft lays.[Milton, Lycidas, Ll. 42-44] It is my thesis that the reader is always making sense , and in the case of these lines the sense he makes will involve the assumption of a completed assertion after the word "seen," to wit, the death of Lycidas has so affected the willows and the hazel copses green that, in sympathy, they will wither and die . In other words at the end of line 43 the reader will have hazarded an interpretation, or performed an act of perpetual closure, or made a decision as to what is being asserted. I do not mean that he has done four things, but that he has done one thing the description of which might take any one of four forms—making sense, interpreting, performing perpetual closure, deciding about what is intended. Whatever he has done he will undo it in the act of reading the next line; for here he discovers that his closure, or making of sense, was premature and that he must make a new one in which the relationship between man and nature is exactly the reverse of what was first assumed. The willows and the hazel copses green will in fact be seen, but they will not be seen by Lycidas. It is he who will be no more, while they go on as before, fanning their joyous leaves to someone else's soft lays . Nature is not sympathetic, but indifferent, and the notion of her sympathy is one of those "false surmises" that the poem is continually encouraging and then disallowing. Stanley E. Fish, professor of English at Johns Hopkins University, is the author of John Skelton's Poetry, Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost, and Self-Consuming Artifacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature. His other contributions to Critical Inquiry include "Facts and Fictions: A Reply to Ralph Rader" , "Normal Circumstances, Literal Language, Direct Speech Acts, the Ordinary, the Everyday, the Obvious, What Goes without Saying, and Other Special Cases" , "A Reply to John Reichert; or, How to Stop Worrying and Learn to Love Interpretation" , and "One More Time" . See also: "Professor Fish on the Milton Variorum" by Douglas Bush in Vol. 3, No. 1; "Stanley Fish's 'Interpreting the Variorum': Advance or Retreat?" by Steven Mailloux in Vol. 3, No. 1; "Interpreting 'Interpreting the Variorum'" by Stanley E. Fish in Vol. 3, No. 1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpreting "Interpreting the Variorum".Stanley E. Fish - 1976 - Critical Inquiry 3 (1):191-196.
Professor Fish on the Milton "Variorum".Douglas Bush - 1976 - Critical Inquiry 3 (1):179-182.
Rudwick’s Variorum II.David Oldroyd - 2005 - Metascience 14 (3):485-488.
Interpreting people and interpreting texts.William Child - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):423 – 441.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
37 (#442,069)

6 months
5 (#700,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Law for Elites.Markéta Štěpáníková & Terezie Smejkalová - 2019 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 59 (1):47-68.
International Courts and Tribunals and Their Linguistic Practices: A Communities of Practice Approach.Vera Willems - 2017 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30 (2):181-199.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references