Becoming: Temporal, Absolute, and Atemporal

In L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), Debates in the Metaphysics of Time. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 87-107 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are two conspicuous and inescapable features of this world in which time is real. One experiences a world in flux, a transient world in which things constantly come into existence, change and cease to be. One also experiences a stable world, one in which how things are at any given moment is permanent, unchangeable. Thus, there is transience and permanence. Yet these two features of the world seem incompatible. The primary purpose of this paper is to sketch a metaphysics of time that embraces both features. Crucial to this undertaking is the notion of becoming, that is, coming into existence. I distinguish three distinct phenomena of becoming: temporal, absolute and atemporal. The last is the least familiar of these; it is the phenomenon of coming into existence outside of time. Although the idea that there are things that do not exist in time is not unfamiliar, it is largely taken for granted that if anything comes into existence, it must do so in time. (Indeed, I suspect many think that the idea of a thing coming to be outside of time is simply incoherent.) In this paper, I articulate and defend the notion of atemporal becoming. It is by means of this notion that one can develop a fully satisfactory metaphysics of time, one that honors both transience and permanence and finds for each its proper domain within the world.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does the subject of experience exist in the world?E. J. Bond - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):124-133.
Time and the domain of consciousness.Christoph Hoerl - 2014 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1326:90-96.
Interpretations of God's eternity.Nicholas Everitt - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (1):25-32.
What Are Kant's Analogies about?Wayne Waxman - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (1):63 - 113.
On McTaggart's Theory of Time.Edward Freeman - 2010 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (4):389-401.
Newton's views on space, time, and motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-26

Downloads
836 (#18,786)

6 months
136 (#28,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

M. Oreste Fiocco
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

The Vagueness Argument Against Abstract Artifacts.Daniel Z. Korman - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (1):57-71.
Creating abstract objects.David Friedell - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (10):e12783.
The phenomenology and metaphysics of the open future.Derek Lam - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):3895-3921.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references