Habermas's moral cognitivism and the Frege-Geach challenge

European Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):319–344 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is the Frege-Geach problem?Mark Schroeder - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):703-720.
Normative uncertainty for non-cognitivists.Andrew Sepielli - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):191-207.
Non-cognitivism and rational inference.Mark Bryant Budolfson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (2):243 - 259.
Hybridizing Moral Expressivism and Moral Error Theory.Toby Svoboda - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (1):37-48.
Quasi-realism, negation and the Frege-Geach problem.Nicholas Unwin - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):337-352.
The frege‐geach point.Paul Horwich - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):78–93.
The Frege–Geach problem and Kalderon's moral fictionalism.Matti Eklund - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):705-712.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#237,717)

6 months
9 (#314,693)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Gordon Finlayson
University of Sussex

Citations of this work

The Habermas-Rawls Dispute Redivivus.James Gordon Finlayson - 2007 - Politics and Ethics Review 3 (1):144-162.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Language, truth and logic.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1936 - London,: V. Gollancz.
Truth and objectivity.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 54 references / Add more references