Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate

Argumentation 37 (1):153-157 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Representing the Structure of a Debate.Maralee Harrell - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (4):595-610.
Competing Narratives in the Russell-Copleston Debate.Andreas Gonçalves Lind & Bruno Nobre - 2020 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76 (4):1363-1396.
A Metafísica de Copleston e o Debate com Russell.Alexander Maar - 2020 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76 (4):1331-1362.
Paraconsistent Logic: A Proof-Theoretical Approach.Hubert Marraud - 2006 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):5-24.
El enfoque deíctico-nomológico de Putnam de los términos para género natural.Hubert J. Marraud - 1986 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 15 (3-4):167-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
20 (#785,698)

6 months
8 (#406,766)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references