Seeing Double: Exploring the Phenomenology of Self-Reported Absence of Rivalry in Bistable Pictures

, , &
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fnhum.2017.00301

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Searching for the switch: Neural bases for perceptual rivalry alternations. [REVIEW]John D. Pettigrew - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2 (1):85-118.
A Primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies.R. R. Blake - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2 (1):5-38.
Assessing the effects of audiovisual semantic congruency on the perception of a bistable figure.Jhih-Yun Hsiao, Yi-Chuan Chen, Charles Spence & Su-Ling Yeh - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):775-787.
Distrusting the present.Jakob Hohwy, Bryan Paton & Colin Palmer - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (3):315-335.
Pictures, Experiential Learning and Phenomenology.Matthew Crippen - 2015 - In András Benedek & Nyiri Kristof (eds.), Beyond Words – Pictures, Parables, Paradoxes. Peter Lang. pp. 83-90.
The Necker–Zeno Model for Bistable Perception.Harald Atmanspacher & Thomas Filk - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):800-817.
Understanding pictures.Dominic Lopes - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Emotional pictures predominate in binocular rivalry.Georg Alpers & Paul Pauli - 2006 - Cognition and Emotion 20 (5):596-607.
Phenomenology and the future of film: rethinking subjectivity beyond French cinema.Jenny Chamarette - 2012 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Semiotic foundations of the study of pictures.Winfried Nöth - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):377-391.
Exploring phenomenology: a guide to the field and its literature.David Stewart - 1974 - Chicago,: American Library Association. Edited by Algis Mickūnas.
Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution. [REVIEW]Frank Tong - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2 (1):55-83.
On the absence of phenomenology.Daniel C. Dennett - 1979 - In Donald F. Gustafson & Bangs L. Tapscott (eds.), Body, Mind, and Method. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 93--113.
Pictures, quotations and distinctions. Fourteen essays in phenomenology.Robert SOKOLOWSKI - 1992 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 184 (4):542-543.
Binocular rivalry between complex stimuli in split-brain observers.Robert P. O'Shea & Paul M. Corballis - 2001 - Brain and Mind 2 (1):151-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-10

Downloads
12 (#1,092,565)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The unreliability of naive introspection.Eric Schwitzgebel - 2006 - Philosophical Review 117 (2):245-273.
The kinetic depth effect.Hans Wallach & D. N. O'Connell - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (4):205.
Parts and wholes in face recognition.J. W. Tanaka & M. J. Farah - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):520-520.

View all 13 references / Add more references