- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Zahar on Mach, Einstein and modern science
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (3):273-282 (1980)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Mach, Einstein, and the rise of modern science.Elie Zahar - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (3):195-213.
Zahar on Einstein.Paul K. Feyerabend - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):25-28.
Review. Paul Feyerabend. Killing time.Robert Nola - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):467-473.
Review of Paul Feyerabend: Science in a free society. [REVIEW]Noretta Koertge - 1980 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):385-390.
Ernst Mach leaves 'the church of physics'.John Blackmore - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):519-540.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and against method: Including Lakatos's lectures on scientific method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
Review of Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend and Matteo Motterlini: For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. [REVIEW]Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
Mach I, Mach II, Einstein, und Die Relativitätstheorie. Eine Fälschung und Ihre Folgen. Gereon Wolter.Robert Disalle - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):712-723.
Imre Lakatos. Paul K. Feyerabend. Sull'orlo della scienza: Pro e contro il metodo.Matteo Motterlini - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):476-478.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
92 (#190,429)
6 months
14 (#200,929)
2009-01-28
Downloads
92 (#190,429)
6 months
14 (#200,929)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Some recent objections to the bayesian theory of support.Colin Howson - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):305-309.
Empiricism and Relationism Intertwined: Hume and Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity.Matias Slavov - 2016 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 31 (2):247-263.
On Mach on time.Karim P. Y. Thébault - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):84-102.
Second thoughts about Machian positivism: A reply to Feyerabend.Elie Zahar - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (3):267-276.
Problem-Solving and Theory Structure in Mach.Zeljko Loparić - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (1):23.
References found in this work
Science in a Free Society.Paul Feyerabend - 1978 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (4):448-451.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-w2v2s uwo