- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Does Rawls Support the Procedural Republic? A Procedural Republic? A Critical Response to Critical Response to Sandel's Democracy's Discontent
Abstract
In Michael Sandel's latest book entitled ican republicanism, Aristotle, and Hegel, com- Democracy's Discontent (1996), he argues munitarians are critical of the individualistic that the prevailing public philosophy (what he methodology liberalism employs. Such a methcalls the procedural republic) that informs..Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Procedural justice?: Implications of the Rawls-Habermas debate for discourse ethics.Cristina Lafont - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):163-181.
The Political Theory of the Procedural Republic.Michael J. Sandel - 1988 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 93 (1):57 - 68.
America's contents and discontents: Reflections on Michael Sandel's America.Rogers M. Smith - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):73-96.
Impure Procedural Justice and the Management of Conflicts about Values.Emanuela Ceva - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):5-22.
Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem.Christian List & Robert E. Goodin - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306.
On rawls’s distinction between perfect and imperfect procedural justice.Martin Gustafsson - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2):300-305.
Humanism and antihumanism in lasch and sandel.Tom Hoffman - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):97-114.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
153 (#124,672)
6 months
8 (#370,225)
2009-01-28
Downloads
153 (#124,672)
6 months
8 (#370,225)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo