Aristotle, Speusippus, and the method of division

Classical Quarterly 50 (2):402-414 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As Aristotle himself says, A.Po. 2.13 is an attempt to provide some rules to hunt out the items predicated in what something is, namely to discover definitions. Since most of this chapter is devoted to the discussion of some rules of division, it may be inferred that somehow division plays a central role in the discovery of definitions. However, in the following pages I shall not discuss what this role is. Nor shall I discuss what place division has in the wider discussion of definition and explanation as it emerges from A.Po. 2. 1 shall rather focus on the argument that Aristotle reports and discusses in A.Po. 2.13.97a6–22, and which our extant sources ascribe to Speusippus. As will become clear later on, this argument undermines the possibility of giving any definition, and Aristotle deals with it here because he can block it by exploiting some properties of the method of division.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle, Speusippus, and the method of division.Andrea Falcon - 2000 - Classical Quarterly 50 (02):402-.
División, definición y diferencia en los "Tópicos".Andrea Falcon - 2002 - Anuario Filosófico 35 (73):297-312.
Homonymy in Aristotle and Speusippus.Jonathan Barnes - 1971 - Classical Quarterly 21 (01):65-.
Aristotle’s Rules of Division in the Topics.Andrea Falcon - 1996 - Ancient Philosophy 16 (2):377-387.
Scientific Method in Meteorology IV.Tiberiu Popa - 2014 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4 (2):306-34.
Aristotle on definition (review).Devin Henry - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 478-480.
On the Chinese Origin of the Galley Method of Arithmetical Division.Lam Lay-Yong - 1966 - British Journal for the History of Science 3 (1):66-69.
Definition and essence in Metaphysics vii 4.Lucas Angioni - 2014 - Ancient Philosophy 34 (1):75-100.
Aristotle on Desire.Giles Pearson - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Plato's Method of Division.S. Marc Cohen - 1973 - In J. M. E. Moravcsik (ed.), Patterns in Plato's Thought. Reidel. pp. 181--191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
21 (#739,695)

6 months
12 (#216,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Falcon
Concordia University

Citations of this work

On what ontology is and not-is.Karin Verelst - 2008 - Foundations of Science 13 (3):347-370.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics.W. D. Ross - 1949 - Philosophy 25 (95):380-382.
Les Listes anciennes des Ouvrages d'Aristote.Paul Moraux - 1951 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 57 (4):452-456.
Zur biographie Des speusippos.Philip Merlan - 1959 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 103 (1-2):198-214.
The Riddle of the Early Academy.Glenn R. Morrow & Harold Cherniss - 1946 - Philosophical Review 55 (2):190.
Kleine Philosophische Schriften.Philip Merlan - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (1):52-54.

Add more references