Michael S Pardo and Dennis Patterson, Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience : Science and Law 101: Bringing Clarity to Pardo and Patterson's Confused Conception of the Conceptual Confusion in Law and Neuroscience [Book Review]

Jurisprudence 7 (1):171-180 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience.Michael S. Pardo & Dennis Patterson - 2013 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA. Edited by Dennis M. Patterson.
Is Neurolaw Conceptually Confused?Neil Levy - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):171-185.
Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience.Dennis Michael Patterson & Michael S. Pardo (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Applying Confirmation Theory to the Case against Neurolaw.Anton Donchev - 2018 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):45-54.
Brain, Behavior, and Knowledge.Walter Glannon - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):191-194.
No Nonsense Neuro-law.Sarah K. Robins & Carl F. Craver - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):195-203.
Morse, Mind, and Mental Causation.Michael S. Pardo & Dennis Patterson - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):111-126.
Minds, Brains, and Norms.Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-05

Downloads
35 (#457,473)

6 months
15 (#168,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Operationism and scientific method.H. Feigl - 1945 - Psychological Review 52 (5):250-259.

Add more references